
In other words, it is clear that up until just a few years ago, the majority of musical artists were not fond of music streaming services for its unethical nature.
However, in 2017, streaming music seems to the be the norm for both listeners and artists. In fact, after Apple responded to Taylor Swift's letter and decided to pay artists for those three months, Swift expressed her gratitude and even featured in an advertisement for the service that went viral: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fK_zwl-lnmc
Although these streaming services still pay artists relatively the same amount as before, nowadays, there does not seem to be any strong opposition from neither artists nor listeners against its unethicality. Instead, artists seem to now be trying to adjust to these changes and doing the best with what they have (i.e. Swift supporting Apple Music). For this reason, though the points expressed in Richmond's article are true, I believe that they are a bit outdated considering the fact that it pushes music listeners to go back to purchasing albums and records which will, speaking realistically, not happen. So, instead of reverting to the past, I believe that we should now seek new ways to support artists through these streaming services such as by promoting artists through the apps or advertising the services so more listeners pay for subscriptions.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/01/media/taylor-swift-apple/
http://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/the-anxious-ease-of-apple-music
No comments:
Post a Comment